Barack Obama, asked about drug history, admits he inhaled

No Comments

Barack Obama, asked about drug history, admits he inhaled
By Katharine Q. Seelye
Published: Tuesday, October 24, 2006

PHOENIX, Arizona — Senator Barack Obama, the Illinois Democrat who said Sunday that he was considering running for president in 2008, has created a little sunlight between himself and both Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

For one thing, he said, “When I was a kid, I inhaled.”

“That was the point,” Obama told an audience of magazine editors.

The direct admission was in contrast to Bill Clinton’s denial in his 1992 campaign for president that he had smoked marijuana.

“I didn’t inhale,” Clinton said, cementing the idea that he liked to have things both ways.

Obama had written in his first book, “Dreams From My Father” (1995), before entering politics, that he had used marijuana and cocaine (“maybe a little blow”). He said he had not tried heroin because he did not like the pusher who was trying to sell it to him.

In an interview here at a meeting of the American Society of Magazine Editors, Obama said he was not making light of the subject.

“It was reflective of the struggles and confusion of a teenage boy,” he said. “Teenage boys are frequently confused.”

The question of drug use has become a standard one for politicians, sometimes as a test of their ability to be straightforward. If the politician has used drugs, conventional wisdom says it is best to try to get the question out of the way early.

Obama was also asked for his views about Hillary Rodham Clinton, the New York Democrat who has been a dominant figure in discussions about potential presidential candidates. Obama praised her but made clear that he did not agree with her vote for the Iraq war.

“I think very highly of Hillary,” he said. “The more I get to know her, the more I admire her. I think she’s one of the most disciplined people I know. She’s one of the toughest. She’s got an extraordinary intelligence, and she’s somebody who’s in this stuff for the right reasons. She’s passionate about moving the country forward on issues like health care and children.”

[Speaking of children, here is the role-model's own words, "When I was a kid, I inhaled.  That was the point"] inserted by Times Enemy

But, he said, they clearly had “different assessments” about the wisdom of going to war in Iraq. Perhaps mindful that he could end up as her vice presidential running mate, he added that he had it easier because he was not in the Senate at the time, while she had to vote.

Asked how he might campaign against her in a primary, he said he had not thought about that.

But he did sound like a candidate in criticizing the Bush administration in somewhat stronger terms than he had previously.

“This administration has done great damage to this country,” he said, citing the Iraq war as the chief reason.

["Maybe a little blow."  Drugs have done massive amounts of damage to this country, and Barack Hussein Obama is sure to smugly note that he did his share.  Do not cheapen the office of President of the United States of America.  Thousands of people are screened every year for national security positions and then there is this guy who has an extremely addictive nature, ranging from nicotine to cocaine, and the public is blind.]  inserted by Times Enemy

  • Share/Bookmark

Search Engine Optimization Spam

No Comments

Greetings.

This is a rant, with a bit of raving.

I am seeing more and more sites designed with some concept of SEO in mind. This is great and dandy, however, it is starting to skew my search results, negatively.

When people place doorknob advertisements on the front door of my home, they accomplish what they want, in that i remember who they are. However, i keep them in mind so as to intentionally avoid doing business with them. Same with fliers placed under my car windshield wiper. To me, it is akin to spam.

Now, as i am searching for various data, i am having to press my querying abilities in order to find relevant results due to the insane amount of misguided SEO efforts. It is difficult to find local based results especially because a company on the other side of the country has done a SEO project to grab search results for “gilbert x y z” or “scottsdale d e f” and thus thrown me into a proverbial wild goose chase. My time is being wasted more and more because of this, and with that lost time is an increased frustration.

My belief is that marketing must not be misleading. Sure the guy in Maine wants my business here in Arizona, but it is basically, for my minds lack of a better phrase, false positive results … Search Engine Spam. It is the responsibility of the web designer to ensure that their SEO projects are legitimate. As web designers and internet professionals, we should be giving our clients quality work while maintaining our own integrity and ensuring their integrity cannot be questioned as well. It is pathetic that so many website designers are profiting from their inability to provide a successful SEO campaign without watering down search results. I put a hat on, then tip it, in gratitude and respect, to those who have the skill and character to produce a valuable SEO site and concurrently improve search engine results.

I am considering making another column to my doorknob hanger blacklisted businesses list, in which SEO Spammers lose my business. This would actually be more effective than banning doorknob spammers, because the SEO Spammers have strategically targeted me and my queries, more so than my living in a certain zip code. In addition to this, i could blacklist the site’s developer as well. Nicewhile, i am finding myself searching for creative queries which will circumvent the SEO Spammers and produce relevant results, eating thirty seconds here and a minute there ….

.javier odom

  • Share/Bookmark